![]() Veracode’s most recent survey on software security, covering the last 12 months, found that about three-quarters of the applications examined contained at least one security flaw, and nearly one-fifth had at least one flaw regarded as being of high severity. Software failures are all too common, as are security vulnerabilities. These incidents made headlines, but they aren’t just rare exceptions. Thankfully, nobody actually suffered such a fate. And in 2019, a software flaw was discovered in an insulin pump that could allow hackers to remotely control it and deliver incorrect insulin doses to patients. A software bug in the trading system of the Nasdaq stock exchange caused it to halt trading for several hours in 2013, at an economic cost that is impossible to calculate. In 2005, faulty software for the US $176 millionīaggage-handling system at Denver International Airport forced the whole thing to be scrapped. It may fail unexpectedly, have unanticipated consequences, or be vulnerable to attack, sometimes resulting in immense damage.Ĭonsider just a few of the more well-known software failures of the past two decades. The programmers who hammer out that code tend to be overburdened, and their first attempt at constructing the needed software is almost always fragile or buggy-and so is their second and sometimes even the final version. Indeed, modern society runs on code: Whether you buy something online or in a store, check out a book at the library, fill a prescription, file your taxes, or drive your car, you are most probably interacting with a system that is powered by software.Īnd the ubiquity, scale, and complexity of all that code just keeps increasing, withīillions of lines of code being written every year. If Neo were to help us peel back the layers, we would find code all around us.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |